Subject: Re: Less filling (Re: Startup times Pike vs. Perl)
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 AD 16:20:13 -0400

Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>Just for the record, the (currently for me) best tradeof for running Pike on

Forgot to mention why it is worth it:
In my case, it trims down the disk-footprint of Pike from around 40MB to
around 13MB.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.
Currently unemployed programmer:
"What do you mean, I can't initialize things in an assert()?"

Return to results